|
|
| Line 47: |
Line 47: |
| | |process_application_owner=Persons, Legal entities | | |process_application_owner=Persons, Legal entities |
| | |process_application_description=Application regarding granting livestock marking types | | |process_application_description=Application regarding granting livestock marking types |
| − | |process_bpmn_digital_source=EUGO
| |
| | }} | | }} |
| | {{process conditions | | {{process conditions |
Revision as of 16:43, 26 June 2026
fe215dea-aca4-43cb-8f78-13826a509a47
611419
Έγκριση Μέσων Σήμανσης στο Πλαίσιο του Εθνικού Συστήματος Αναγνώρισης και Καταγραφής Βοοειδών-Αιγοπροβάτων και Χοίρων
At a glance
Points of service
Points of Single Contact (ΚΕΠ – EKE), Department of Animal Protection, Drugs and Veterinary Applications, MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND FOOD
Number of required documents
Description
The procedure concerns granting approval for types of marking used for the identification and registration of bovine, ovine, caprine and pigs (under the national system framework). In particular, the marking types are used for the identification of the animals and the can be:
- a) Conventional marking type. Eartags that are placed on animals ears and have printed on the identification number
- b) Electronic marking type. The identifier that consists of a read only passive transponder, which does not contain an internal power source, implanted in ruminal bolus or in eartag and have coded information that concern animals identification number. In order to take into consideration future developments in the field of Identification and Registration of Bovine, Ovine, Caprine and Pigs, it is possible the definition to be expanded in other types of
Electronic marking type, if such types will be prescribed in national and european legislation.
- c) Electronic reader devices. Reader that consists of a transceiver, which after activates the transponder of the electronic marking type, receives and appears information included in its code.
Concerns citizens, businesses and legal entities.
Basic information
Competent body
MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND FOOD
Service / organizational unit of a authority entity
Department of Animal Protection, Drugs and Veterinary Applications
Application
Application Type
Application
Submission by:
Submitted by the applicant (in person or by post)
Submitted by:
Persons, Legal entities
Title
Application regarding granting livestock marking types
What you will need
Means of authentication, identification and signature
Identification with TAXISnet codes, Identification document
Related
Means of redress or appeal:
Other
A redress may be submitted within 15 working days form the date of the receipt of the decision. The applicant may provide any additional information (Article 9 JM 170285/2011), if requested.
Output & Results
Output
Document Production
Other information
Official title
granting approval of marking types for the identification and registration of bovine, ovine, caprine and pigs - under the national system framework
Languages supported
Greek, English
Ways of provision
Establishment
Registries updated
Μητρώο εγκεκριμένων Μέσων Σήμανσης
Categories
Trigger (submission method)
Application (handwritten)
N1
ΔΔ
11
4
0
0
2
0
85324
No
259200
259200
Identification with TAXISnet codes, Identification document
448874
1.4
7135, 8210
EU-GO
Supporting document
The procedure concerns granting approval for types of marking used for the identification and registration of bovine, ovine, caprine and pigs (under the national system framework). In particular, the marking types are used for the identification of the animals and the can be:
- a) Conventional marking type. Eartags that are placed on animals ears and have printed on the identification number
- b) Electronic marking type. The identifier that consists of a read only passive transponder, which does not contain an internal power source, implanted in ruminal bolus or in eartag and have coded information that concern animals identification number. In order to take into consideration future developments in the field of Identification and Registration of Bovine, Ovine, Caprine and Pigs, it is possible the definition to be expanded in other types of
Electronic marking type, if such types will be prescribed in national and european legislation.
- c) Electronic reader devices. Reader that consists of a transceiver, which after activates the transponder of the electronic marking type, receives and appears information included in its code.
Concerns citizens, businesses and legal entities.
0.00
0.00
5
1
0
2 months
,,
1
Company law
Business formation (individual, corporate)
- For company establishment see the link below
No
No
2
Possession of passwords to enter software
The applicant shall have a TAXISnet username and password.
No
No
3
Administrative
Application Submission – Solemn Declaration for the approval of livestock marking types
No
No
4
Administrative
Legal representation of the applicant
No
No
5
Administrative
Notification of potential intermediaries in Greece, excluding retailers
No
No
6
Administrative
Obligations of Owners and Distributors of Approved Marking Types, according to par. 1 of Article 6 of the JMC, as amended by article MD 17/891/2018.
No
No
7
Administrative
Attachment of samples regarding markings to be approved
No
No
8
Administrative
Compliance with marking type(s) specifications
No
No
1
Proof of legal representation of the construction company by the applicant, in case the application is submitted by a natural or legal person, who legally represents a foreign construction company.
Legal documents from legal entities
Proof of legal representation of the construction company by the applicant, in case the application is submitted by a natural or legal person, who legally represents a foreign construction company.
Submission by:
Submitted by the applicant (in person or by post)
Submitted by:
Persons, Legal entities
Document submitted under requirements:
Yes
Document’s requirement:
Company law
No
9338
2
Notification statement of potential intermediaries in Greece, excluding retailers
Certificate
Notification statement of potential intermediaries in Greece, excluding retailers
Submission by:
Submitted by the applicant (in person or by post)
Submitted by:
Persons, Legal entities
Document submitted under requirements:
No
No
9703
3
Solemn Declaration of compliance by the applicant and any intermediary distributor.
Solemn Declaration
Solemn Declaration of compliance by the applicant and any intermediary distributor.
Submission by:
Submitted by the applicant (in person or by post)
Submitted by:
Persons, Legal entities
Relevant Procedure:
Solemn declaration and electronic solemn declaration
Document submitted under requirements:
No
No
7320
4
Samples as follows:
- Conventional marking types: two sets of ear specimens (sample and counter-specimen), with at least ten (10) ears each group, for each type or shape.
- Electronic marking types: two sets of samples of electronic marking means (sample and counter-sample), with at least five (5) intra-stomach bolus or electronic earthing bands each group, for each type or shape
- Electronic reader devices: one (1) sample reader for each type, excluding devices that are for permanent installation.
Sample
Samples as follows:
- Conventional marking types: two sets of ear specimens (sample and counter-specimen), with at least ten (10) ears each group, for each type or shape.
- Electronic marking types: two sets of samples of electronic marking means (sample and counter-sample), with at least five (5) intra-stomach bolus or electronic earthing bands each group, for each type or shape
- Electronic reader devices: one (1) sample reader for each type, excluding devices that are for permanent installation.
Submission by:
Submitted by the applicant (in person or by post)
Submitted by:
Persons, Legal entities
Document submitted under requirements:
No
No
4999
5
On a case-by-case basis, wherever it is appropriate (depending on whether they are conventional / electronic markers or readers) as described in Annex I of JMD 170285/2011 and as amended by MD 17/891 / 2018, the evidence below is required:
- Complete and detailed descriptions of quality and technical characteristics
- Copies of the necessary certificates
- Warranty of proper/smooth operation
- Solemn Declaration of commitment for the disposal of marking types that may need to be replaced, as detailed in Annex I of JMD
- Declaration of the minimum age / body weight of the animal in which it can be placed
Supporting documents per case
On a case-by-case basis, wherever it is appropriate (depending on whether they are conventional / electronic markers or readers) as described in Annex I of JMD 170285/2011 and as amended by MD 17/891 / 2018, the evidence below is required:
- Complete and detailed descriptions of quality and technical characteristics
- Copies of the necessary certificates
- Warranty of proper/smooth operation
- Solemn Declaration of commitment for the disposal of marking types that may need to be replaced, as detailed in Annex I of JMD
- Declaration of the minimum age / body weight of the animal in which it can be placed
Submission by:
Submitted by the applicant (in person or by post)
Submitted by:
Persons, Legal entities
Document submitted under requirements:
No
No
4332
6
On a case-by-case basis, wherever it is appropriate (depending on whether they are conventional / electronic markers or readers) as described in Annex I of JMD 170285/2011 and as amended by MD 17/891 / 2018, the evidence below is required:
- Complete and detailed descriptions of quality and technical characteristics
- Copies of the necessary certificates
- Warranty of proper/smooth operation
- Solemn Declaration of commitment for the disposal of marking types that may need to be replaced, as detailed in Annex I of JMD
- Declaration of the minimum age / body weight of the animal in which it can be placed
Additional supporting documents
On a case-by-case basis, wherever it is appropriate (depending on whether they are conventional / electronic markers or readers) as described in Annex I of JMD 170285/2011 and as amended by MD 17/891 / 2018, the evidence below is required:
- Complete and detailed descriptions of quality and technical characteristics
- Copies of the necessary certificates
- Warranty of proper/smooth operation
- Solemn Declaration of commitment for the disposal of marking types that may need to be replaced, as detailed in Annex I of JMD
- Declaration of the minimum age / body weight of the animal in which it can be placed
Submission by:
Submitted by the applicant (in person or by post)
Submitted by:
Persons, Legal entities
Document submitted under requirements:
No
No
9102
Joint Ministerial Decision
170285
2011
2236
Β
Ministerial Decision
2
17/891
2018
425
Β
1
Start of procedure
No
No
2
Submission of application
Responsible for Implementation
Competent directorate"Competent directorate" is not in the list (Competent Secretariat General, Competent Directorate General, Competent Secretary General, Competent Directorate, Competent Director, Competent Department, Competent Employee, Competent Ministry, Competent Minister, Competent Undersecretary, ...) of allowed values for the "Process step official" property.
Μethod of Implementation
Manual Action
Description
The interested party submits the application and a file with the required supporting documents to the Directorate for Animal Protection, Veterinary Medicinal Products and Veterinary Applications (PZPVE) of the Ministry of Rural Development and Food or to a KEP-EKE.
Notes
Where the file is submitted to a KEP-EKE, it is then forwarded by the KEP-EKE to the PZPVE Directorate.
It is noted that the submission date is considered to be the date on which the complete file is submitted.
Yes
No
3
Electronic submission of application and supporting documents
Μethod of Implementation
Software action
Yes
No
4
Assignment of protocol number
Responsible for Implementation
Competent directorate"Competent directorate" is not in the list (Competent Secretariat General, Competent Directorate General, Competent Secretary General, Competent Directorate, Competent Director, Competent Department, Competent Employee, Competent Ministry, Competent Minister, Competent Undersecretary, ...) of allowed values for the "Process step official" property.
Μethod of Implementation
Manual Action
Description
The application receives a protocol number (submission date).
No
No
5
Forwarding of file to the competent three-member committee
Responsible for Implementation
Competent directorate"Competent directorate" is not in the list (Competent Secretariat General, Competent Directorate General, Competent Secretary General, Competent Directorate, Competent Director, Competent Department, Competent Employee, Competent Ministry, Competent Minister, Competent Undersecretary, ...) of allowed values for the "Process step official" property.
Μethod of Implementation
Manual Action
Description
The PZPVE Directorate forwards the application file to the competent three-member committee.
No
No
6
Checking of completeness and correctness of supporting documents
Responsible for Implementation
Competent directorate"Competent directorate" is not in the list (Competent Secretariat General, Competent Directorate General, Competent Secretary General, Competent Directorate, Competent Director, Competent Department, Competent Employee, Competent Ministry, Competent Minister, Competent Undersecretary, ...) of allowed values for the "Process step official" property.
Μethod of Implementation
Check"Check" is not in the list (Software action, Signature, Manual Action, Digital signature, Action of the executive / co-competent body, Inspection, Citizen action) of allowed values for the "Process step implementation" property.
Description
The Three-Member Committee examines the application file as to the completeness and correctness of the supporting documents.
No
No
7
Informing the applicant in case of deficiencies
Responsible for Implementation
Competent directorate"Competent directorate" is not in the list (Competent Secretariat General, Competent Directorate General, Competent Secretary General, Competent Directorate, Competent Director, Competent Department, Competent Employee, Competent Ministry, Competent Minister, Competent Undersecretary, ...) of allowed values for the "Process step official" property.
Μethod of Implementation
Check"Check" is not in the list (Software action, Signature, Manual Action, Digital signature, Action of the executive / co-competent body, Inspection, Citizen action) of allowed values for the "Process step implementation" property.
Description
If the file is not complete, the applicant is informed in writing, with proof of receipt, of the deficiencies so that the missing documents or samples may be provided within a time limit of 15 working days from the date of receipt of the written notice.
If the applicant does not respond within this time limit, the committee refrains from the examination procedure.
Notes
Step completion time: 2 days, within the 2-month time limit.
Yes
No
8
Checking of supporting documents, certificates and samples
Responsible for Implementation
Competent directorate"Competent directorate" is not in the list (Competent Secretariat General, Competent Directorate General, Competent Secretary General, Competent Directorate, Competent Director, Competent Department, Competent Employee, Competent Ministry, Competent Minister, Competent Undersecretary, ...) of allowed values for the "Process step official" property.
Μethod of Implementation
Check"Check" is not in the list (Software action, Signature, Manual Action, Digital signature, Action of the executive / co-competent body, Inspection, Citizen action) of allowed values for the "Process step implementation" property.
Description
The Three-Member Committee examines the supporting documents, certificates and samples.
Notes
Step completion time: 2 days, within the 2-month time limit.
Yes
No
9
Sending part of the sample to a laboratory to confirm compliance with technical specifications (if deemed necessary)
Responsible for Implementation
Competent directorate"Competent directorate" is not in the list (Competent Secretariat General, Competent Directorate General, Competent Secretary General, Competent Directorate, Competent Director, Competent Department, Competent Employee, Competent Ministry, Competent Minister, Competent Undersecretary, ...) of allowed values for the "Process step official" property.
Μethod of Implementation
Check"Check" is not in the list (Software action, Signature, Manual Action, Digital signature, Action of the executive / co-competent body, Inspection, Citizen action) of allowed values for the "Process step implementation" property.
Description
If deemed necessary, the Three-Member Committee sends part of the sample to a laboratory to confirm compliance with technical specifications.
Notes
Step completion time: 2 days, within the 2-month time limit.
No
No
10
Carrying out trial placements to confirm compliance with the technical specifications (if required)
Responsible for Implementation
Competent directorate"Competent directorate" is not in the list (Competent Secretariat General, Competent Directorate General, Competent Secretary General, Competent Directorate, Competent Director, Competent Department, Competent Employee, Competent Ministry, Competent Minister, Competent Undersecretary, ...) of allowed values for the "Process step official" property.
Μethod of Implementation
Check"Check" is not in the list (Software action, Signature, Manual Action, Digital signature, Action of the executive / co-competent body, Inspection, Citizen action) of allowed values for the "Process step implementation" property.
Description
If deemed necessary, the Three-Member Committee carries out trial placements to confirm compliance with the technical specifications.
Notes
Step completion time: 2 days, within the 2-month time limit.
No
No
11
Drafting of recommendation report by the Three-Member Committee
Responsible for Implementation
Competent directorate"Competent directorate" is not in the list (Competent Secretariat General, Competent Directorate General, Competent Secretary General, Competent Directorate, Competent Director, Competent Department, Competent Employee, Competent Ministry, Competent Minister, Competent Undersecretary, ...) of allowed values for the "Process step official" property.
Μethod of Implementation
Manual Action
Description
The Three-Member Committee drafts a report with a recommendation to grant approval or a recommendation to reject the application and forwards it to the PZPVE Directorate.
The Committee also drafts a recommendation to reject the application if the applicant has not responded by submitting the missing documents or samples after the above time limit has expired.
No
No
12
Forwarding of the Committee’s report to the Head of the General Directorate and drafting of the relevant recommendation
Responsible for Implementation
Competent directorate"Competent directorate" is not in the list (Competent Secretariat General, Competent Directorate General, Competent Secretary General, Competent Directorate, Competent Director, Competent Department, Competent Employee, Competent Ministry, Competent Minister, Competent Undersecretary, ...) of allowed values for the "Process step official" property.
Μethod of Implementation
Manual Action
Description
The PZPVE Directorate forwards the Committee’s report and recommends approval or rejection of the application to the Head of the General Directorate of Veterinary Services for signature.
In the event of rejection due to late submission of the requested supplementary documents or samples by the interested party, no recommendation is forwarded to the General Director and a rejection decision is drafted directly and forwarded to the Head of the Directorate for signature.
No
No
13
Signing of decision
Responsible for Implementation
Competent General Directorate"Competent General Directorate" is not in the list (Competent Secretariat General, Competent Directorate General, Competent Secretary General, Competent Directorate, Competent Director, Competent Department, Competent Employee, Competent Ministry, Competent Minister, Competent Undersecretary, ...) of allowed values for the "Process step official" property.
Μethod of Implementation
Signature
Description
The decision to grant or not grant approval of the means of marking is signed.
Notes
2 months in total from submission of the application
No
No
14
Assignment of unique approval code number and recording of approval in the relevant Register
Responsible for Implementation
Competent directorate"Competent directorate" is not in the list (Competent Secretariat General, Competent Directorate General, Competent Secretary General, Competent Directorate, Competent Director, Competent Department, Competent Employee, Competent Ministry, Competent Minister, Competent Undersecretary, ...) of allowed values for the "Process step official" property.
Μethod of Implementation
Manual Action
Description
Where a decision granting approval is issued, the means of marking is assigned a unique Approval Code Number and the approval is recorded in the Directorate’s Register, which is posted on the body’s website.
It is noted that the P.Z.F.K.E. Directorate keeps a record of all applications, files and samples of means of marking submitted for approval.
Notes
2 months in total from submission of the application
No
No
15
Sending of decision to the interested party
Responsible for Implementation
Competent directorate"Competent directorate" is not in the list (Competent Secretariat General, Competent Directorate General, Competent Secretary General, Competent Directorate, Competent Director, Competent Department, Competent Employee, Competent Ministry, Competent Minister, Competent Undersecretary, ...) of allowed values for the "Process step official" property.
Μethod of Implementation
Manual Action
Description
The PZPVE Directorate sends the decision to the interested party, with proof of receipt.
Notes
2 months in total from submission of the application
No
No
Regarding Marking Types of Bovine, Ovine, Caprine and Pigs
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
