|
|
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | |process_official_title=Decision on an application for international protection | | |process_official_title=Decision on an application for international protection |
| | |process_description=The procedure concerns the decision on the application for international protection. Following the procedure of full registration of an applicant for international protection and after conducting the interview with the applicant, the competent authority (Regional Asylum Office or the Asylum Autonomous Unit) decides on the applications for international protection status or not. | | |process_description=The procedure concerns the decision on the application for international protection. Following the procedure of full registration of an applicant for international protection and after conducting the interview with the applicant, the competent authority (Regional Asylum Office or the Asylum Autonomous Unit) decides on the applications for international protection status or not. |
| − | Decisions, as individual administrative acts, should contain a statement of reasons, including a finding that the legal conditions for their issuance are met. The reasons must be clear, specific, adequate and sufficient and must be apparent from the information in the file (Article 17 of the Code of Administrative Procedure). In particular, for rejection decisions, Article 82 para. 8 of Law No. 4636/2019 provides that the decision should state the factual and legal reasons for the rejection. It is addressed to citizens. | + | |
| | + | Decisions, as individual administrative acts, should contain a statement of reasons, including a finding that the legal conditions for their issuance are met. The reasons must be clear, specific, adequate and sufficient and must be apparent from the information in the file (Article 17 of the Code of Administrative Procedure). |
| | + | |
| | + | In particular, for rejection decisions, Article 82 para. 8 of Law No. 4636/2019 provides that the decision should state the factual and legal reasons for the rejection. It is addressed to citizens. |
| | |process_org_owner_is_private=No | | |process_org_owner_is_private=No |
| | |process_org_owner=56992 | | |process_org_owner=56992 |
| | |process_provision_org_owner_directory=812562 | | |process_provision_org_owner_directory=812562 |
| − | |process_provision_org_group=6061, 5077 | + | |process_provision_org_group=5077, 6061 |
| | |process_provision_org=56992 | | |process_provision_org=56992 |
| | |process_provision_org_directory=Asylum Service | | |process_provision_org_directory=Asylum Service |
| | |process_remarks=In the rejection decision, reference is made to the time limit for lodging an appeal, as well as to the automatic suspensive effect, under certain conditions, of this decision on the execution of the refund decision, to the body before which the appeal is lodged, to the consequences of the expiry of this time limit, as well as to the possibility and conditions for the provision of free legal assistance in proceedings before the Appeals Authority, in accordance with the provisions of the ministerial decision of paragraph 8 of article 7 of Law No. 4375/2016. | | |process_remarks=In the rejection decision, reference is made to the time limit for lodging an appeal, as well as to the automatic suspensive effect, under certain conditions, of this decision on the execution of the refund decision, to the body before which the appeal is lodged, to the consequences of the expiry of this time limit, as well as to the possibility and conditions for the provision of free legal assistance in proceedings before the Appeals Authority, in accordance with the provisions of the ministerial decision of paragraph 8 of article 7 of Law No. 4375/2016. |
| | + | |
| | More specifically, the applicant is entitled to bring the appeal before the Appeals Authority. | | More specifically, the applicant is entitled to bring the appeal before the Appeals Authority. |
| − | a. j. Against a decision, which rejects an application for international protection as unfounded under the regular procedure; and | + | *a. j. Against a decision, which rejects an application for international protection as unfounded under the regular procedure; and |
| | j. against a decision granting subsidiary protection status, in so far as it concerns the non-recognition of the applicant as a refugee. | | j. against a decision granting subsidiary protection status, in so far as it concerns the non-recognition of the applicant as a refugee. |
| | Time limit: within thirty (30) days from the service of the decision or from the time when the applicant is deemed to have taken cognisance of it. | | Time limit: within thirty (30) days from the service of the decision or from the time when the applicant is deemed to have taken cognisance of it. |
| − | β. Against a decision rejecting an application for international protection under the accelerated procedure, either as inadmissible, , and in cases where the appeal is lodged while the applicant is in detention. | + | * β. Against a decision rejecting an application for international protection under the accelerated procedure, either as inadmissible, , and in cases where the appeal is lodged while the applicant is in detention. |
| | + | |
| | Time limit: within twenty (20) days from the date of service of the decision or from the date on which the applicant is deemed to have knowledge of it. | | Time limit: within twenty (20) days from the date of service of the decision or from the date on which the applicant is deemed to have knowledge of it. |
| | + | |
| | Exception: appeal against a decision rejecting an application for international protection as inadmissible where another MS has assumed responsibility for examining the application within fifteen (15) days pursuant to Regulation (EU) 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, which is deemed to be an appeal against the relevant transfer act. | | Exception: appeal against a decision rejecting an application for international protection as inadmissible where another MS has assumed responsibility for examining the application within fifteen (15) days pursuant to Regulation (EU) 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, which is deemed to be an appeal against the relevant transfer act. |
| | + | |
| | Against a decision rejecting an application for international protection in cases of border procedures or in cases where the appeal is lodged while the applicant is in a Reception and Identification procedure, within seven (7) days from the service of the decision or from the time when the applicant is presumed to have taken cognizance of it. | | Against a decision rejecting an application for international protection in cases of border procedures or in cases where the appeal is lodged while the applicant is in a Reception and Identification procedure, within seven (7) days from the service of the decision or from the time when the applicant is presumed to have taken cognizance of it. |
| | + | |
| | Against the decision rejecting a subsequent application as inadmissible, within five (5) days from the service of the decision. | | Against the decision rejecting a subsequent application as inadmissible, within five (5) days from the service of the decision. |
| | + | |
| | During the time limit for lodging an appeal and until service of the decision on the appeal, any measure of expulsion, readmission or return of the applicant shall be suspended. | | During the time limit for lodging an appeal and until service of the decision on the appeal, any measure of expulsion, readmission or return of the applicant shall be suspended. |
| − | |process_provided_language=English | + | |process_estimated_implementation_duration_max=P6M |
| | |process_evidence_identification_type=Identification document | | |process_evidence_identification_type=Identification document |
| | |process_type=Ingoing/Outgoing | | |process_type=Ingoing/Outgoing |
| Line 27: |
Line 36: |
| | |process_usage=Supporting document, Other | | |process_usage=Supporting document, Other |
| | |process_output_type=Decision | | |process_output_type=Decision |
| − | |process_source=Framers, SDG
| |
| | |process_provided_to=Immigrants/Refugees | | |process_provided_to=Immigrants/Refugees |
| | |process_tax_type=Decisions | | |process_tax_type=Decisions |
| − | |process_life_events=Asylum Services,Asylum Services | + | |process_life_events=Citizens of other States,Insurance |
| | |process_sdg_resource=Hierarchical appeal/recourse | | |process_sdg_resource=Hierarchical appeal/recourse |
| | |process_total_duration_steps_min=240 | | |process_total_duration_steps_min=240 |
| Line 44: |
Line 52: |
| | |process_evidence_step_total_number=0 | | |process_evidence_step_total_number=0 |
| | |process_evidence_step_digital_total_number=0 | | |process_evidence_step_digital_total_number=0 |
| | + | |process_source=Framers, SDG |
| | |process_sdg_codes=D4 | | |process_sdg_codes=D4 |
| | |process_application_type=Application | | |process_application_type=Application |
| Line 49: |
Line 58: |
| | |process_application_description=Folder with identity data and other information collected during the full registration process of an applicant for international protection. | | |process_application_description=Folder with identity data and other information collected during the full registration process of an applicant for international protection. |
| | |process_application_note=A lot of information about the applicant is collected during the full registration process. | | |process_application_note=A lot of information about the applicant is collected during the full registration process. |
| | + | |process_provided_language=English |
| | |process_estimated_implementation_duration=15552000 | | |process_estimated_implementation_duration=15552000 |
| − | |process_estimated_implementation_duration_max=P6M
| |
| | }} | | }} |
| | {{process conditions | | {{process conditions |
